Truth may be hurtful and cruel sometimes

Last updated on November 29, 2024

I believe that most souls in this world have no significant gap in development level (not yet at least), so the main origin for different social development level between peoples or countries is culture, tradition and institution but race or any individual intrinsic nature. So I’d like to talk a little about the culture, tradition and institution, especially in North America and India/Africa.

Someone said that the US was established on inclusiveness. Really? Were European colonists any bit inclusive at all to local NA Indians before/during/after the founding of US? Were European colonists more inclusive in NA than in their other colonies like India/Africa? What a ridiculous lie and cheating! It’s exactly the opposite.

The colonization of Europeans in NA was totally filled with terrible crimes and evils, and everyone knows how inclusive European colonists were in NA until even 10 years after second world war! From these evil crimes, we can tell easily, that what generated the development difference between US and other European colonies was not the level of souls but something else. And obviously, European colonists kept their culture, tradition and institution quite purely the same kind in NA as in Europe, and this European culture, tradition and institution happened to be the one which created and started modern civilization (in democracy, science, etc.) of this world several hundred years ago.

But in India and Africa, it’s a totally different story. English made India people speak English successfully, and French made African people speak French successfully, but except that, they were very much more inclusive in India and Africa than in NA to utilize local culture, tradition and institution to maximize their own profit at lower cost, in which they combined with existing local culture and cooperated with local landlords, autocrats, warlords, chieftains and even enslavers in India and in Africa on something like planting (opium?) and trading slaves (especially black captives of other blacks), and you can see the consequences of this inclusiveness in India and Africa.

Although today’s NA seems obviously much more successful than India and Africa, NOT any such success may make any excuse for such terrible evil crimes committed by European colonists to NA Local Indians. It’s really a pity that there should have been a better way than the evil criminal colonizing history in NA, but this better way is not the inclusive way for deterioration in colonizing history of India or Africa absolutely. Such a better way might be out the reach of this humanity not only yesterday but also maybe even today, but this shall not be the excuse for yesterday’s European colonists or today’s anyone to choose wrong way on colonization and inclusiveness.

Although the way of colonization which European colonists chose in NA was terrible crime and evil, the lies and cheating of contributing the success of NA to the inclusiveness of deterioration is exactly same wrong and evil. Why not be inclusive to cannibalism or slavery or xxtherfucker or heroin or any other worse stuff? Because, only right and positive inclusive of culture, tradition and institution can lead to better and greater, and the wrong and negative inclusive of culture, tradition and institution leads only to deterioration and destruction (sooner or later lastly).

Europe gave birth to modern civilization including modern democracy (election and parliamentary representation system) and modern science (including technology) of this world, and then spread the influence of this modern civilization to all this world. But if you see the present social status from east Asia to Africa to Middle East to India which have been fed up with the influence of this modern civilization so many years, you may wonder: except Europe, no matter given how many years, could any other people ever give birth to a modern civilization with modern democracy and science on their own independently at all?

South America is something between NA and India/Africa. Oceania is something like NA.

The economic success of East Asia is much less a success of the inclusiveness for culture, tradition and even institution, because both US and east Asia have never adopted exactly the culture, tradition and even institution of each other, for the biggest and most typical example China has almost the same culture, tradition and institution as past 2000 years which is completely different from US. East Asia is much more a successful example for its own local culture, tradition and even institution combined with the inclusiveness of US on exporting (and the inclusiveness of East Asia on importing) the economic vitality, knowledge, innovation and purchasing capabilities from US to East Asia. It’s a pity that US seems unable to help other people make an really independent sustainable success based on exactly the same core of culture, tradition and institution of US, especially when US and Europe are in a mess and big trouble themselves now.

Truth may be hurtful and cruel sometimes, no matter if you like it or not, but only truth can brighten our way forward to be better and greater, and cheating, lies and faking can only lead us to deterioration and destruction.