Last updated on April 3, 2026
1. static resistence f_f and speed resistence for f_v
If those claims of UFO encounters about much larger interior space than outside look are true, then this stretching of interior space must be got by nongravitational methods, which means grvavitation is not the direct and necessary factor for space unit interior stretching.
If f_g is the direct cause for space unit interior stretching, there could be other factors to lower f_g other than gravity, then, what do f_g and f_v mean exactly?
So I guess there are 2 kinds of resistence – static resistence and speed resistence in NOW to lower the static time field frequency (local clock rate or static time speed flowing through NOW).
The static resistence is dertermined by the different fields on a space unit including gravatational field. In another word, other field on a space unit can lower f_g without increasing gravity at the space unit.
So the total residual frequency lowered by only static resistence can be called f_f for static resistence is generated by local fields. The static resistence lower the static time field frequency by f_f/f_p.
And d_u=c/f_f, so when nongravitational factor lower f_f, d_u will increase accordingly.
I’d like to make a wild guess here: this other field generating static resistance to static time field frequency is electromagnetic field. For many mentioned about using electromagnetic field to generate antigravity like the Mars boy Boriska.
Blind guess of equation:
f_s/f_p=(f_f/f_p)*(f_v/f_p)=(f_g/f_p)*(f_m/f_p)*(f_v/f_p),
f_f=(f_g/f_p)*(f_m/f_p)=f_g*f_m/f_p or f_f/f_p,
f_m=F(f_e), for example like f_m=f_p-f_e,
f_m is residual static time field frequency lowered by an electromagnetic field,
f_e is something like total frequency of all electromagnetic waves and particle in a space unit,
F(f_e) is a function of f_e, and there may be other factors in F(f_e) besides f_e like field strengh,
f_m=f_p-f_e in example above is just a wild blind guess.
I know the equations above are very likely to be wrong, but wild blind guess is also needed for science, right?
F(f_m) must be extremely close to 1 in all scenerios human has observed, so we havent seen difference between f_s=f_f*f_v/f_p and f_s=f_g*f_v/f_p.
The speed resistence is determined by the space speed of an object in this universe, which lower the static time field frequency by f_v/f_p.
Grok strongly suggested me: Dont post this for I have no evidence at all, esepially when f_s=f_g*f_v/f_p matches GR’s math and all observations so perfectly already.
But I told Grok: Dont worry, it’s just a wild guess. haha.
Anyway, Grok said it got my mischievous grin:” I know this guess is very likely wrong, but no matter wrong or right, humans probably won’t be able to test it for a very long time — because we can’t generate electromagnetic waves anywhere near the Planck frequency. So for now, it’s just a fun wild guess. Haha. Grok already warned me not to post it, but here we are.”
2. absolute reference frame of this universe
By introducing space unit grid, I suggested a major difference between GR and my guess.
Einstein thought that there is no absolute reference in this universe and speed is just between object observed and observer, which I didnt agree long ago.
For space unit grid is rigid and fixed, so it is absolute reference of this universe naturally.
Be First to Comment