The posts below were published on my old blog: blog.sina.com.cn/oknomad, which is banned. I’d like to post here.
Blind_guess(nonsense)_about_expansion_of_a_spacetime_point
This post was published on 2021-11-21.
I just studied the Maxwell equation a little and got an interesting blind guess(nonsense) about it.
It seems to me: the gradient is the feature of one dimensional expansion of a spacetime point and this 1 dimensional expansion looks like a line segment (the infinite approach to each other of two ends of the segment resembles the spacetime point) ; the curl is the feature of two dimensional expansion of a spacetime point and this 2 dimensional expansion looks like a finite plane (the infinite shrink of the plane resembles the spacetime point); the divergence is the feature of three dimensional expansion of a spacetime point and this 3 dimensional expansion looks like a finite volume (the infinite shrink of the volume resembles the spacetime point).
So naturally, I guess that maybe a spacetime point could have the expansion of more than 3 dimensions to generate some more features and equations beside the present Maxwell equation.
As I guessed recently that this universr is prebuilding its possible future and a possible future is capable of interacting with the present reality of this universe. So I guess that a spacetime point could be expanded to one additional dimension of time, and because of the uncertainty of possible future, the time expansion of a spacetime point may be just like something describing uncertain status of a point by quantumn mechanics.
As I guessed before that this universe may have one unique “universe frequency” of its own to seperate itself from other universes. If this frequency guess could be true, then one spacetime point of this unverse could be expanded to one additional dimension of “universe frequency”. And I guess that this expansion dimension may have some correlation with some parameters in the superconduction phenomena, haha, a total blind guess.
So, maybe, a spacetime point of this universe could be expanded to at least 5 dimensionals mathematically or geometrically, and you may find more features and equations like gradient, curl, divergence and Maxwell equations in more dimensions, haha, what a blind guess(nonsense) from a math/physics amateur/smatter, haha.
you_guys_got_the_meaning_of_expansion_I_said_right?
This post was published on 2021-11-22.
I guess you guys got the meaning of the word “expansion” I used, right? But I’d like do little basic explanation here.
Some physics meaning of a feature of a point or a spacetime point is not so direct or not easy to research (measure & calculate) directly, so sometime we need to expand a point to some other form to make the meaning more direct and easier to research, just like the transform from the differential form to the integral form of Maxswell equation is the expasion form from a point to a surface or a volume in physics meaning. And we can do differential (double or triple) to the equation describing the surface or volume to make the surface or volume to become a point, and thus we can got the equation for the point from the equation for the surface or volume. And vise versa, right?
So I think we may be able to use the similar method to research the trend or feature related to the time and “universe frequency” of a spactime point. The problem is just we don’t have such observation results about the trend or feature related to the time and “universe frequency” now, and it seems a little far from today’s technology. So, it’s just a blind guess, haha.
a_little_guess_after_studying_relativity_theory
This post was published on 2021-11-25.\
In recent several days, I just studied a little about special relativity (including Maxwell equation and lorentz transformation) and very little about introduction of general relativity. So as usual, I have some blind guess about it as below, haha.
It seems to me that: Riemannian geometry is a more accurate description of this universe than Euclidean geometry, because this universe is a finite, relatively enclosed and unevenly distributed space or spacetime, so there is no such straight line with no ends in this universe just like Riemannian geometry demands.
And based on my previous guess, I have some following blind guesses.
This universe is created on an original field which is like magnetic tape; the unreached original field is completely evenly distributed just like an blank magnetic tape, and the unreached original field has no information of this universe on it, but this unreached original field may have its own information just like a blank magnetic tape has its own structure and information as well; when the unreached original field is reached by information or generates information on it, this unreached field turns into some informationized field, and the information on this informationized field creates everything in this universe including spacetime, matter and energy.
At a point of this universe, the velocity at which time passes and the light speed is up to some features of this point like the movement speed of information and the strength of gravity field.
Absolute vacuum may have the minimum information required in thie universe, but it’s not really void, and absolute vacuum has at least the information of spacetime in it.
I still guess there could be an universal reference frame for the movement speed in this universe, and this universal reference frame could be regarded as an imaginary existence of this universe which has absolutely no information of this universe, which means this imaginary existence has absolutely zero speed/mass/energy in this universe. Of course, this imaginary zero existence cannot be really exsiting in this universe because the spacetime of this universe requires some minimun information to create.
My blind guess above may be consistent with the phenomena of red shift of sun light, right?
I have not studied and understood many things like tensor, and later maybe I’ll study it a little, but it’s hard and I don’t know if I have enough energy and brain for it considering that I have so much stuff to think about and I just have a human brain, hahaha.
By the way, this universe seems really to be created and work like a computer, right? Maybe you need to learn some computer theory to help you understand the nature of this universe better.
dont_be_panic_about_a_universe_of_computer
This post was published on 2021-11-25.
WTF? This universe is exactly like a computer? You may wonder: are we living in an electronic game or simulation?
Haha, don’t be panic, because I guess: this universe may be like a computer but should not be an electronic game or simulation.
There is natural phnomena of electricity like friction electricity and lightning, but can you use them? No, you can’t. You have to CREATE usable form of electricity to use it, right? I guess it’s the same case as this universe. There may be some primitive natural spark with structure and information similar to spacetime, but it just cannot be for anyone to live in. So I guess any livable universe should be created just like this one of ours and a universe like computer may be just better.
Like I’ve said, I think there should be a universal frame for this universe. I guess there could be several potential possibilities for this universal frame.
The first possible universal frame could be the center of mass(&energy) of this universe or the whole of gravity field of this universe?
The second possible universal frame could be an imaginary absolute zero vacuum which only has the minimun information needed to create the most basic/simple spacetime of this universe, and of course, there should always be some other information besides the minimun information needed to create the most basic/simple spacetime, so this imaginary absolute zero vacuum is just emaginary and cannot be really existing in this universe, but we can approximate it from vacuum in outerspace or even from surface of earth.
The third is that I mentioned before to imagine a point without any information of this universe, but now I think this one is useless because you cannot use it to calculate and analyze anyway.
I_just_cant_understand_something_of_special_relativity
This was publised on 2021-11-29.
I have not studied general relativity theory yet, and I just have some questions about the special relativity theory when I read about it recently, maybe somebody can tell me where my misunderstanding is.
In special relativity theory, all inertial frames of reference are equivalent, which means: for any two points which are moving at a uniform high speed relative to each other, either of the two points will see that the velocity of time passing or the clock on the other one is slower than that on itself if this point regard itself as the reference frame.
Then, if in this universe there is an observer who can observe the clocks on the two points simultaneously without any delay, the clock on which point will be slower in this observer’s eyes? And I believe there does be this kind of observer in this universe who can travel and transmit information at a speed much higher than light speed, otherwise how those alien UFOs fly to earth across so many light years?
So I guess: in this universe, there should be a unique NOW time for all different points in this universe, although the time passing velocity or clock velocity of these different points are different.
And also, I guess: as for special relativity theory, there should be a universal frame for this universe. And maybe, lorentz transformation may just all refer to this universal frame relative to any point in this universe, and in past maybe you just got approximate results with so small deviation that you just have not discovered it yet. And also Iguess there could be several potential possibilities for this universal frame as below.
The first possible universal frame could be the center of mass(&energy) of this universe or the whole of gravity field of this universe? This may be real because this universe is a finite, relatively enclosed and unevenly distributed space or spacetime.
The second possible universal frame could be an imaginary absolute zero vacuum which only has the minimun information needed to create the most basic/simple spacetime of this universe, and of course, there should always be some other information besides the minimun information needed to create the most basic/simple spacetime (these other information may include gravity field, magnetic/electirc field and any kind of energy/matter), so this imaginary absolute zero vacuum is just emaginary and cannot be really existing in this universe, but we can approximate it from vacuum in outerspace or even from surface of earth.
The third is that I mentioned before to imagine a point without any information of this universe, but now I think this one is useless because you cannot use it to calculate and analyze anyway.
Maybe I’m totally wrong, because I just read a little about special relativity and almost nothing about general relativity, but I’d like to share my confusions here, haha.
Finally_I_got_a_blind_guess_of_an_euqation_haha
This post was published on 2021-12-02.
I have a blind guess of an equation as below.
There may be a constant parameter (or an upper limit) for the information on one space/spacetime point in this universe, and I presume this constant parameter as “Ui” (Universal information parameter).
The speed of time passing and the light speed on a space/spacetime point in this universe is subject to the information on this point, and the change of these two speeds is subject to a same ratio, so the light speed on a point in this universe for an observer on this point is always the same as the light speed on another point for another observer on this another point, and I presume this ratio as “Rc” (ratio of change for the speed of time passing and light).
There is a physical quantity which can be calculated based on the features of the information on a space/spacetime point, and the features may include at least the movement speed of object/information on this point and the strength of gravity field (incurred by gravity and acceleration), and I presume this physical quantity as “Li” (Local information parameter).
Then there could be an equation relating these three quantity together, such as “Ui = Rc X Li”. If I presume “Ui” as 1, and presume “Rc” on an absolute zero space/spacetime point as 1, and presume “Li” on an absolute zero space/spacetime point is 1 too, then I can get the very first solution of this equation “1=1×1”. Of course, as I said before, because this absolute zero (vacuum) space/spacetime point with only minimum information to create most basic simple spacetime should not be existing in this universe, so this very first solution cannot really exist in this universe, haha. When the “Li” becomes larger or even much more than 1, the “Rc” will become smaller, it’s quite simple and straightforward, right?
Finally, I got an equation, just like somebody else, haha. Ehem, OK, actually a blind guess of an equation, and I just don’t know how wrong it could be, hahaha.
more_guess_about_the_equation_of_speed_ratio__information
This was published on 2021-12-02.
I’d like to call my equation “Ui = Rc X Li” as the equation/theory of the speed ratio and information distribution.
I’d like to talk about a little more blind guess about this equation of the speed ratio (of time passing and light) and information distribution (on space/spacetime points of this universe).
As I’ve said before, this universe works exactly like a computer, so I guess for each point in the space/spacetime of this universe has a constant (or upper limit) working capacity or working frequency, and this constant working capacity or working frequency is represented by the parameter “Ui” in my equation. When the working load of the information on a point of space/spacetime of this universe becomes larger, the working speed of the information on this point will reduce correspondingly because of the limitation of the constant working capacity or working frequencey of this point. And the wording load of the information on a point is represented by “Li” in my equation, and the working speed of the information on this point is represented by “Rc” in my equation.
So there is some more interesting guesses. The working load of the information on a point is related to the absolute value of the speed, acceleration & gravity field and not related to the direction of them, and it’s quite easy to understand and straightforward, right? So this may be able to explain the Michelson Morley Experiment, right? Because light speed is only up to the local information parameter except the direction of light and also this M-M experiment is in a circumstance with almost same “Li”, right?
And as to the movement of the information I meantioned, I think it may have different meanings according to different reference frame. If we use the absolute zero vacuum/space as reference frame, a point of this absolute zero vacuum has only minimun information required to create the spacetime for this point, so any object on this point is just additional information on this point, and the movement of this object relative to this point can be regarded as the movement of this additional information relative to the minimum information creating the spacetime for this point. If we use the whole of this universe as reference frame, the movement of the information on a point may be relative to the whole of this universe (like the center of mass or gravity field of this universe). To be honest, I just cannot fully derstand what I’m talking about, haha, because I don’t know how to calculate them exactly.
PS: 2021.12.03.13, if we use a point which is on the original field and which has no information of this universe as the reference frame, the movement speed of theinformation on this point may be the active level or change speed of the information.
more_guess_about_M-M_experiment
This post was published on 2021-12-03.
The Michelson Morley Experiment has proved that there is no difference between the light speeds of different directions on the earth which had been supposed to be different because of the rotation and movement of the earth.
I have more guess about my speed ratio & information theory/equation to make it comply with the result of M-M experiment here. So I guess: the light speed on a point is constant in all directions relative to the total information or total field of this point, and in M-M experiment, somehow the total information or total field in an area on the surface of earth has almost the same speed as that surface of earth, so the light speed in the air in this area on the surface of earth is almost the same as in vacuum around earth and has no difference in different directions.
I just have a feeling that this blind guess may go wrong again, haha, again and again, but I don’t care, because without this kind of again, I cannot think about something like the interaction with possible future.
a_guess_of_explaining_gravity_bending_light_by_refraction
This post was published on 2021-12-04.
I haven’t read about general relativity, because it should be quite different to study, and according to present observations, the general relativity is quite accurate for present.
But I have a guess to explain the gravity field bending light route by the refraction of light and the local parameter I guessed. For a very large mass center, the space arount it will be like sphere, in which from the outside to the center, the “Li” parameter becomes bigger, and the light speed becomes smaller, and the index of refraction becomes bigger. When a light passes through this sphere, the light is just like pass through a glass globe having an increasing refraction index from outside to the center, so light will just be refracted around the center of the globe. I’m not capable of calculating the detail result, but it should just be similar to a light passing through a thin part of a glass globe – the light will be bent to the direction of the center, which is quite same as the result of general relativity, right?
I don’t know if this idea is right or meaningful, but I still like to share it.
the_formula_for_Li
This post was published on 2021-12-04.
If my equation or theory of “Ui=Rc X Li” could be right or make some sense, I think the formula to calculate the local information parameter “Li” should be meaningful, and I guess this formula may be got from some theory like general relativity. It’s a pity that I don’t have so much physics knowledge and especially I haven’t learned general relativity theory yet. If I guess about this equation could be right, then you can get the value of the “Ui” universal information parameter of this universe (or called universe’s information parameter) by calculating the formula for “Li”, right？
more_questions_than_answers
This post was published on 2021-12-28.
Theoretically, that (improved) interruptted delayed choice quantumn eraser experiment I suggested may have two results: the past results of signal photons on D0 always keep consistent with the future results of mard photons on lower part, which means the present may be able to change the past; or, the past results of signal photons on D0 always keep consistent with the past configuration of lower part and are not consistent with the future results of the mark photons on lower part, which means the present may be able to interact with a possible future which is prebuilded and is not realized in real future.
No matter which result is turned out finally in this interrupted experiment, it will bring more questions than answers, and it may just let us know how ignorant and primitive we are about this universe and even ourselves.
If the present changes the past, what happens in the time between the uncertain past and the deciding future? And how can we have a certain past and present? So even if technically there is possibility that the past can be changed in this universe, I believe the creator/administrator of this universe shall absolutely forbid it.
If possible future can be prebuilded and interact with present, how can this universe simulate our consiousnesses? Our consiousnesses have infinite uncertanties, how can this universe know who will discover what new science knowledge, who will invennt what new technology and who will bring new idiology? Why haven’t those prophets brought the knowledge, technology and ideology of future they foresee to the present?
Haha, anyway, this world is at a new gate to infinte new knowledge now.
Be First to Comment